Sunday, May 4, 2014

Suffer for Fashion


Remember the post on the amazing work of Charles James, arguably the first American couturier? Well, since the Met Ball, held this coming Monday, is dedicated to his designs, Vogue gave us some insider insight into those aspects of his design that escape the naked eye.

First off we learn that the man was a bitch:

Universally praised for his talent, Charles James was also famously high-strung. “Fashion’s last angry man,” is how one reporter described the highly articulate designer, who could be wickedly funny (he called Woolworth’s “Barbara Hutton’s boutique”), or just plain vicious. If James lived in the digital age, one can imagine that he’d be an avid commenter, and an active ignorer of the “like” button.
 
James’s biggest beef was with the system. Seventh Avenue was largely an anathema to James, a couturier, who believed in the trickle-down theory of fashion, a notion that the sixties Youthquake and the emergence of designer ready-to-wear lines (like Yves Saint Laurent’s Rive Gauche), put to rest. While James’s elitist view of fashion now seems out of step, his belief in the value of a designer’s name, and his campaign for the need for support and recognition of and for American designers was prescient.
 
When not tangling with Seventh Avenue or the IRS (James was anything but a successful businessman), the designer sometimes gave vent to more personal grievances.  Diana Vreeland, the legendary Vogue editrix once said: "Charlie’s got every talent. The only talent he lacks is getting along with people. He thinks it’s rather cute.”

And secondly, his designs demanded COMMITMENT:

Avoir du chien is a French expression used to describe an exceptionally chic woman. It’s also a fairly accurate description of what, by our creative accounting, it would feel like to sport Charles James’s eighteen-pound “Butterfly” gown—approximately the combined weight of five baby French bulldogs. Ever the contrarian, James often gave his dresses ethereal names from nature—“Rose,” “Petal,” “Four-Leaf Clover”—despite the fact that they were weighty, meticulously constructed, and designed to “correct” the wearer’s form, i.e. one-up Mother Nature.

They weren’t called wearable sculptures for nothing: Some of James’s gala gowns tipped the scales at ten to 20 pounds. (To be fair, they were engineered to distribute the weight to provide ease of movement; for example, most of the heft of the Four-Leaf Clover dress in anchored at the hips.) Still, a James dress was as demanding as its designer. Wonder what it might feel like to wear one? Let us do the math for you.



The Ultimate - A Black Shirt II

Neglected in the last Ultimate post were tops less blousy and more Tshirty, i.e. garments of less formal nature but still impactful enough to elicit a wow.

Like so:

DREAM:

Jonathan Saunders:

Versace1:
Versace 2:



Versace 3:
Nordstrom:

WISH:

Surface to Air:
Robacco:

Vince:

WANT:

Helmut Lang:


Susana Monaco:

Zara:



Saturday, May 3, 2014

The Ultimate - A Black Blouse


So I don't know if it is properly a blouse we're after in this post. The aim is to find the best examples for yet another hardworking staple of everyone's closet - a black, long sleeve top that is dressy enough to wear to work and that has a decent amount of wow.

What are the requirements of said black top, ye ask?

1) it cannot be a regular button down. That is the key property of the white shirt that we've already addressed in our previous post.  A black button down is too harsh. Here we are looking for softer lines and higher impact design elements.

2) It cannot be too dressy - no excessive lace, sheer, sparkle, ties, buttons.

3) the fabric needs to be fairly flowing, draping - again in a bid to avoid stiffness.

With this in mind, lets go ladies:

DREAM:

**1) From Ann Demeulmeester, a designer I adore, a shirt with a twist, literally:


2) Just on this side of too sexy by IRO:

3) Proenza Schouler:

**4) Alexander Wang, a cool top in jersey:

5) A nice little accent on this one from Derek Lam:

WISH:

1) Rag & Bone: 

2) Joie:
3) Helmut Lang:

**4) A really cool shirt and it is on sale!:

5) Silky from Club Monaco:

WANT:

1)  So yes, it has another color in it, but it is cool and on sale!:
3) Ella Moss:
**4) Club Monaco:

Friday, May 2, 2014

Men and Uniforms


LO and I were discussing an hereto untapped audience on this blog - men. Men, who have no idea how to dress themselves, where to buy stuff, and why to bother.

No, not all of them are like that. Some actually have great sartorial sense - but they are kinda rare. Most would wear whatever is hanging in their closet into oblivion.

Well, apparently the men invited to the Met Ball are all aflutter. Anna Wintour has tightened up the dress code to strict white tie.

If you ask me most old style formal wear is ludicrous, unless worn by women, like so:



So how strict is Anna Wintour, ye ask? Ha! She might invite KaKa and Kanye (as she did last year, prompting Gwyneth to pronounce the ball declasse) but she wants her dress code. Here's a hilarious Jezebel story:

The Met Ball is fast approaching on its aspirational, inscrutably-themed wings, and hoardes of male celebrities are quaking in terror and uncertainty.
Yes, you read that right — THE MEN DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO WEAR. According to WWD, Anna Wintour "sent a shiver down the spine" of every highly-paid fancyman in America when she decreed that the Costume Institute gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art would be "white tie and decorations," instead of the usual men's dress code, which is "whatever tuxedo you have lying around." If, like me, you are a rube who only half-watchedDownton Abbey because you were preoccupied with looking at photos of Scott Disick's cat on Instagram, then you may wonder if the shiver is warranted. "Literally just put on a white neck-thing and a festive broach or something," you might have mumbled to a picture of Leonardo DiCaprio upon hearing this news.
But, no, that's incorrect: the first rule of White Tie is that you have do to abide by a very bizarre and strict dress code, and if you do anything wrong then you might as well have arrived in a patterned Snuggie. To adhere to a white tie dress code, one must wear the following:
[A] black tailcoat, matching trousers with a single stripe of satin or braid in the U.S.; two stripes in Europe or the U.K.; a white piqué wing-collared shirt with stiff front; a white vest; white-colored (e.g., mother-of-pearl) studs and cuff links; a white bow tie; white or gray gloves; black patent shoes, and black dress socks. A top hat is optional.
In the words of Blacktieguide.com, "When executed sloppily, it is no more than a magician's costume. When carried out skillfully, its adroit balance of militaristic authority and refined elegance elevates the most ordinary of men to royals and Rockefellers." (Ummm, ok, that is a prejudiced and ignorant statement about magicians. I guess no one at Blacktieguide.com has heard of MERLIN, the most elegantly refined man in history.)
Anyway, if you do it wrong you are an obvious laughingstock. Take this hilarious account from John Kent of Savile Row tailor Kent Haste & Lachter:
"Among some of the funnier things I've seen is white tie at a garden party — when dress code calls for a morning suit — white tie worn with a cummerbund, or with the waistcoat showing below the front of the tailcoat."
A CUMMERBUND WITH A TAILCOAT! IF YOU CAN BELIEVE IT! HA-HA!
So, the pressure is on, male celebrities. Simon Doonan points out that the new dress code will "inject the occasion with a whole new sartorial focus and take the spotlight off the women for a change." And being in that spotlight will be about as difficult as surviving the French Revolution, according to my estimations: one fashion journalist describes being clad in white tie as "like wearing a guillotine, or having a knife cutting into your throat." Accordingly, the assorted fancymen aren't messing around — WWD reports that Lanvin is making a custom suit for New York Knick Amar'e Stoudemire, while Ralph Lauren is doing the same for Hamish Bowles and Andre Leon Talley. Because Leon Talley is a big proponent of the caftan, maybe he will intentionally court the magician costume look for fashion reasons.
In my dream world, Kim Kardashian shows up in a morning suit with her cummerbund out as a statement.
And here, ladies, is the WWD story, because you can't accuse me of being not thorough:

The Met Ball: In a Tizzy About Tails


The artistic director of Condé Nast and editor in chief of Vogue sent a shiver down the spines of every male celebrity, fashion designer and just plain hangers-on when she declared the dress code for the Costume Institute gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art on Monday night would be “white tie and decorations.” Usually it’s only the female contingent that have to angst over their wardrobe choice for the evening. The men just had to make sure their tuxedo didn’t have any spots on it from the last evening of revelry.

Not this year. 

Ateliers are busy whipping up white-tie ensembles for celebrity clients and the male designers themselves. Lanvin, for one, is said to be making the suit for 6-foot, 11-inch New York Knick Amar’e Stoudemire, while Ralph Lauren is doing the same for Hamish Bowles and André Leon Talley. While budget isn’t usually a concern at an event where a single ticket goes for $25,000, the “white tie” rule is only adding to the cost of the event for fashion houses, since a bespoke suit for a man can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000 or more — not to mention the dresses the houses are creating for their female celebrity clientele.

And while this is the fashion world and attendees no doubt will take many liberties — as seen in the sketches WWD commissioned of some who are likely to attend — for those looking for tips, here is one firm rule: There is no wiggle room when it comes to white tie.

“There is no leeway,” said G. Bruce Boyer, a men’s fashion authority and coauthor of “Gary Cooper: Enduring Style.” “If you say full evening dress, there isn’t any interpretation. Men do it without thinking. That’s why it was thought to be a great decision. Your wardrobe was all taken care of — you follow the rules and that’s it. There’s no fooling around.” 

To do it properly, the rules are rigid — just ask Emily Post: a black tailcoat, matching trousers with a single stripe of satin or braid in the U.S.; two stripes in Europe or the U.K.; a white piqué wing-collared shirt with stiff front; a white vest; white-colored (e.g., mother-of-pearl) studs and cuff links; a white bow tie; white or gray gloves; black patent shoes, and black dress socks. A top hat is optional.

Blacktieguide.com says of white tie: “When executed sloppily, it is no more than a magician’s costume. When carried out skillfully, its adroit balance of militaristic authority and refined elegance elevates the most ordinary of men to royals and Rockefellers.”

That’s why traditionalists think “modernizing” white tie is the equivalent to the Queen turning up in ripped jeans. 

“You don’t modernize it. You wear it as is,” insisted John Hitchcock, a 52-year veteran of venerable Savile Row tailor Anderson & Sheppard, who is the firm’s managing director and head cutter.

That means a white waistcoat made of marcella — or piqué — cotton and a double-breasted tailcoat with peak lapels covered in silk grosgrain. Trousers have two rows of braid running down the side of the leg, as opposed to one row, as in a tuxedo. 

But as stuffy as white tie might seem to some, the style is seeing a resurgence for one main reason: “Downton Abbey.” It seems many men, especially in the U.S., aim to be the Earl of Grantham or Matthew Crawley — or at least dress like the lords of their manor. 

“‘Downton Abbey’ has helped us a lot in the U.S. It’s been so popular there, and I think men watched it and thought: ‘I’ll have one for myself,’” said Hitchcock. 

He said his clients on both sides of the Atlantic tend not to ask for changes to the traditional white tie. “We make a lot of white tie for our customers in the U.S. I’m making one right now for a very modern man in America. He told me to make it exactly the same as it was in the 1930s.” 

That’s the point of white tie: It’s timeless. So the mere thought of what some of the men will turn up in on Monday night has a few men’s wear experts harrumphing into their port.

“There’s no such thing as white tie and decorations,” bristled Tom Mastronardi, chief marketing officer of Paul Stuart. “The whole notion of white tie and tails is that there’s no embellishment. It’s the most formal that a man can get. It’s elegant and simple and it shouldn’t be played with.”

“I’m staying unusually classic,” said Hamish Bowles, the international editor at large for Vogue magazine. “White tie is white tie. This is an unusual sartorial injunction. Ralph Lauren made me the most wildly flattering thing. It’s not often that I get invited to a ball in Vienna, so I’m delighted to have an excuse to wear it. But I have no legitimate medals of decoration so there’s room for whimsy.”

Bowles said he expects the attendees to stretch the rules a bit when picking out their wardrobes. “It’s a fashion creative crowd and I imagine people will be initiating their own idiocentric twists. I think there will be subtle tweaks as part of the ‘decorations.’ But a roomful of men in classic white tie would be spectacular.”

Nick Foulkes, the London-based journalist and author, also is cautious about the Met’s dress code this year.

“White tie and decorations is the grandest form of social dress,” he said. “For me, it’s like wearing a guillotine, or having a knife cutting into your throat. I hate it. If you are wearing decorations — such as the Légion d’honneur — you can end up looking like a very uncomfortable Christmas tree. That said, men do look good in it — as if they’ve walked out of a Thirties musical, with Cab Calloway playing in the background. It’s become a personal trademark of Sir Elton [John]. The question, ‘Are you going to White Tie?’ refers to Elton’s summer [White Tie & Tiara] ball. I can only imagine the atrocious interpretations you’ll see at the Met Ball on Monday.”

John Kent of Savile Row tailor Kent Haste & Lachter said many men struggle with wearing white tie correctly.

“Among some of the funnier things I’ve seen is white tie at a garden party — when dress code calls for a morning suit — white tie worn with a cummerbund, or with the waistcoat showing below the front of the tailcoat. Some people get it all wrong. It’s like wearing a suit with three biro pens and ruler sticking out of the front pocket. The white-tie waistcoat should stop half an inch underneath the front of the tailcoat, and never hang out. 

“Sometimes, I even see white tie worn with Gucci loafers. It should be worn with sheer socks and dress pumps — although you can get away with patent leather lace-ups. You have to play by the rules. The tailcoat can be black with a velvet collar, or midnight blue, with a blue-black collar. White tie is not very popular at the moment. We’ve just done one for a customer who belongs to a livery company [an historic trade association based in the City of London], and we do them for dancers and musicians. If there is a medal that needs putting on, we make a silk loop that protects the coat from the pin.”

Clearly getting it right isn’t easy. President Obama was criticized for wearing a white bow tie with his Hart Schaffner Marx black tuxedo to his first inauguration, although he got it right when he wore white tie to the annual Al Smith charity dinner in New York during the campaign. Ironically, his more upper-crust rival Mitt Romney made the faux pas of having his waistcoat protrude below the front of his tailcoat. Maybe that’s why he lost the election?

But we are in the 21st century and there are those who think people need to lighten up — within limits. 

“We’re like dinosaurs in the men’s industry,” said Joseph Abboud. “It’s a new world today, much more informal, so when it comes to festive dress, it can be fun, but the range is so big, there’s a risk for seeing some god-awful clothes. If the Met says white tie and decorations, that’s going to be good for smart, creative people, but a train wreck for bad people. It’ll be like the formal version of casual Fridays.”

Abboud said “any guy whose first and last names are interchangeable will have tails in his closet,” but the invitation is “going to throw most business guys into a panic — we should start a hot line.”

Abboud, who doesn’t own tails of his own, said all he can think about when he envisions white tie is the dance sequence in “Young Frankenstein” when Mel Brooks and the Monster, played by Peter Boyle, don full formal dress — complete with canes and top hats — to dance to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” “We have to stop taking ourselves so seriously,” he said.

Simon Doonan, creative ambassador at large for Barneys New York, can’t wait to see how men are going to dress at the gala. “I think it’s fantastic,” he said. “This is a fun new way to make the event even more glamorous.” Although he doesn’t think “everybody is going to show up dressed like Fred Astaire,” the dress code will “inject the occasion with a whole new sartorial focus and take the spotlight off the women for a change.” 

Thom Browne feels the same: “It’s nice that the guys have to put some thought into what they have to wear.”

There is one major problem with it all, though: Finding an off-the-rack version isn’t easy. Paul Stuart sells white bow ties, but no tails. And shoppers will be hard-pressed to pop into their local men’s shop and find an appropriate outfit. But Hickey Freeman proudly proclaims it still makes tails at its Rochester, N.Y., facility, and is stocking up for the event at its New York City store, and Brooks Brothers is also standing at the ready. 

“We carry the full look,” said Glen Hoffs, fashion director of Brooks Bros. “And we’re running low on everything at the moment. We have detachable-collar piqué shirts, vests, tails and the proper shoes with the grosgrain bow. We’re ready for those people who want to take the opportunity to be Fred Astaire for the evening.”

Although Hoffs said, “Our friends on the other side of the pond do it best,” he thinks the Americans can pull it off, too. “They understand the rules better and they have more occasions to wear it, but let’s prove that we can do it as well,” he said.

And if Brooks Bros. and Hickey Freeman are sold out, there’s always MW Tux, the tuxedo rental arm of Men’s Wearhouse. The retailer offers full dress tails from Joseph & Feiss, along with the requisite white piqué wing-collar shirt, white bow tie, white and silver studs and cuff links and black round-toe formal shoes for $154.99 for a four-day rental. 

Sign up for a loyalty card and that price drops to $124.99.

Dress Your Life - The Outfit Changing Scarf


I seem to start every post with the words "it is cold in the Northeast'. But. BOY. It was COLD. It was miserably cold. We've been in the 40s for the past few days, below 40 if you count the wind-chill. And it rained. All. The. Time.  If this is the mini-ice-age then I'm going to look for warmer climates..

But then, all of a sudden, half way through yesterday, it became warm. And then rapidly really warm.

The saying is true. If you don't like the weather in Boston wait an hour. Granted the saying is only true for spring/summer. Most of the other time it is just plain cold.

Anyway.

What can take your outfit from drab to fab in no time, ye ask?

A scarf.
Throw it over anything and your look is immediately more polished and put together.

And since it is spring, and since we all want to look fresh - a WHITE scarf.  I've been on a white kick for a while - hampered only by my inability to keep white as clean as I would like to. White  - the right white, without yellow, but a pure, shining white - tends to illuminate the face, make it look younger, brighter.

Oh,  and handily white kind of goes with anything. Except other, mismatched white.

With that in mind here is a selection, almost all a bit ethnic in inspiration:

DREAM:

**Saks: This is almost two scarves in one, depending on how you wear it (LUST):

This Rag&Bone one made me laugh:

WISH:

Club Monaco (Kinda Perfect, don't ya think?)


Yoox:
WANT: 

Zara  (no, it isn't white, but the frosty, icy blue can act like a white - same, btw goes for a very pale pink):

JCrew (on Sale!)
And this Anthropologie one, while not purely white was just adorable!


Finally, to assist you ladies with your scarf wrapping steez here is a very handy instructional video. Watch and learn!




Nostalgia Friday - D&G




Yesterday came the news that Domenico Dolce and Stafano Gabbana, the dynamic duo behind D&G, has been found guilty on tax evasions in an Italian court and are sentenced to 18 months in jail and a E500k fine.




First off - the good news:

Italian courts manage a conviction!! The country of Berluschoni and bunga bunga parties has a working legal system!!


Secondly, likewise in the rubric of good news - CNN has a sense of humor! Their headline announcing this momentous occasion: Is orange the new black for D&G?

LOL.
I never much liked Dolce& Gabbana. There was always something a little cheap about them and their courting of celebs. Their look was tightly corseted, bosomy, animal print sexy. They had a thing for obvious fetishes.
That said some of their exploitations of classic Italian looks were on point - humorously.
Like so:


And then of course were their multiple collaborations with Madonna. They designed two of her tours (none as iconic as the Gaultier did) - this is a design from Girlie:
And she headlined some of their ads:

So for your Friday Nostalgia enjoyment, ladies, here's the Queen of Pop saying with her Tshirt that Italians do it better:

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Over-Thought Fashion


Sometimes good designers get so much into their own heads they over-design. Self-editing is a terribly hard skill to maintain, and when you're stressed, and competitive, and under pressure to deliver season after season, collection after collection, the overdesign bug must be very dangerous.

Like so, from Proenza Schouler, and the same modified dress worn recently by the never-aging Lucy Liu:



In both cases the armor-like bodice is not flattering (although the runway version is better), skirt is too distracting when paired with the bodice, and the shoes - while different in each look - are both clunky, clod-hoppery, and just plain terrible.  Less is more, ladies.

Or here, another example, this time from Roksanda Ilincic's Spring 2014 collection (which was otherwise quite fab, and had lots of orange lovelies):


Or, in a modified version, worn by Lizzy Caplan (whose costumes in "Masters of Sex" I love while being bored silly by the show itself):

There are just too many crafty elements here and they fail to cohere into one succinct sartorial statement. Come to think of it the whole thing smacks of something an anal-retentive OCD patient would draw to calm themselves.. Kinda like Lee Krasner's work, as in so (Untitled, 1948):