Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Skin Care Maxims of the Depressing Kind

The following interview with Beyonce's dermatologist (from the NYMag) was digestible - up to a moment. The moment when he lays out dietary restrictions.

No cheese. No yogurt. No anything.

Read it and weep ladies. The secret to young looking skin is living in denial.

Beyoncé’s Dermatologist Says Exfoliate Every Day


Maybe Beyoncé woke up like that — but most likely she follows the advice of Dr. Howard Lancer, one of L.A.'s top "dermatologists to the stars." With an office next to Hermès on Rodeo Drive and a VIP waiting room for clients like Kim Kardashian and Victoria Beckham, Dr. Lancer's products were formerly offered only at his practice until Oprah apparently begged him to make them available for sale. He obliged, and now his famous three-step system and his new book,Younger: The Breakthrough Anti-Aging Method for Radiant Skin, are widely available. He talked to the Cut about the difference between celebrity and civilian skin, the necessity of exfoliating every day, and why getting facials only four times a year is useless.
Why did you decide to write your new book, Younger?
I have probably the largest, solo dermatologist practice in the world with about 30,000 active patient files. I’m going to be 61 in September. Younger is my legacy of the consumer understanding of home skin care. It states the easy steps someone has to take to find the fountain of youth within themselves. It really exists.
What is the fountain of youth?
The book explains the necessity of reducing stress, of a decent sleep profile. If you don’t reduce stress or get a decent amount of rest and sleep, beauty and health are virtually impossible to attain. I’ve been teaching it to my patients since 1980. While writing the book, I also thought, Who do I see that has the world’s worst skin? Those are people that have diabetes. It’s due to sugar imbalance and insulin intolerance. 
 What diet produces the best skin?
The diet recommended is 40 percent protein, 40 percent fats like olive oil and grapeseed oil, and 20 percent carbohydrates. I can tell you that by following my own advice, I lost 60 pounds. It wasn’t designed to be a weight-loss concept, but nutrition to make your skin look better. It was by accident.
There are also a few, specific recommendations — the first is salt reduction to the point of zero added salt. It doesn’t matter if it’s kosher or Himalayan or rock salt. You must go to a zero-added-salt [diet]. Rule two — animal dairy products to zero. Dairy products are toxic to skin-cell metabolism. Rule three has to do with carbohydrates. The carbohydrates in my diet are a gigantic, fresh apple or grapefruit. Carbohydrates cause spikes in insulin production. Insulin stress reduces skin-cell metabolism.
What makes the Lancer method special?
There are about 10,000 beauty brands in the world. I see patients who bring me things from countries I’ve never even heard of. People are always asking for the magic ingredient, but that’s totally screwed up. The Lancer method is three steps: An exfoliating polish first and rinsing the skin, then doing the cleanse, and a multifaceted single polish afterward. It’s totally re-inventing the concept of skin care so the polish is always first.
Most traditional advice recommends you don’t exfoliate every day. Why exfoliate so often? Won’t this degrade the quality of the skin?
The outer layer of skin in both men and women is called the epidermal stratum corneum. You need to exfoliate that before it can even tolerate proper cleansing. If you have a tough stain on your kitchen counter, you need to scrub first before you can clean, it’s the same thing. Daily damage, age damage, and sun damage need to be exfoliated before [the face is] cleansed. 
Why don’t more dermatologists recommend exfoliating every day?
Twenty years ago, dermatology was a very special specialty. In 2014, now everyone is a dermatologist. Every aesthetician and cab driver in New York is a dermatologist. When a physician tells you once to twice a week, they don’t understand that they need to explain what an exfoliant really is.
A mechanical exfoliant is an enzyme that is protein-based. Exfoliation means allowing the top layer of skin to be nourished. It is just removing dull-skin debris and allowing oxygen to transfer the lower layers of skin. When most doctors say exfoliation shouldn’t happen every day, they are talking about standard scrubs, which is sandpaper in a bottle. They don’t have a concept of what products are available.
Exfoliating properly is a nightly event. It’s sort of like exercise. There are some individuals who tell you to exercise 20 minutes a day. The real good trainers will tell you that you must do a small amount of exercise daily.
Wouldn't Retin-A reduce the need for daily exfoliation?
Retinoic acid is important in terms of not only increasing skin-cell growth rate but increasing cell membrane nutrients to increase oxygen transport, which supports the collagen matrix. It is a daily aid to keep the cells functioning properly, not just increasing cell turnover.
The skin-cell maturation process may take 21 days. But the movement of cells and maturation is hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly. Different cells are transforming all the time. When the primitive look is to say cell turnover is every 28 days — it's every second. The retinol is the skin product that allows that and it is included in my method as well.
Your office is unique in that there is also facials offered on-site. Why are they important to your practice?
Well, they must be done by a properly trained aesthetician, physically in a dermatologist's office. I would never go to a free-standing aesthetician. You need someone that is medical grade and well-trained. Someone tied at the hip with a dermatologist. The benefits of a good aesthetician treatment is that it teaches the patient how to take care of their skin.
When I have patients who tell me they go for facials four times a year, that’s worthless. I suggest three- to four-week intervals. I have four aestheticians in my office. Every day when they’re doing treatments, I pop in and micromanage their topical skin care.
I don't think dermatologists like that exist in New York.
It shouldn’t be. A good office usually has medical-grade aesthetician.
It’s known that you also have a few celebrity clients. What is the biggest difference between celebrity skin and non-celebrity skin? Celebrities should have access to every single beauty product in the world.
While celebrities may have access to all kinds of beauty products and treatments, they also live with the public's expectation that they look flawless at all times. The stress of this alone is enough to wreak havoc on the skin, without even considering the constant makeup application it often takes to maintain this ideal. The true difference between celebrity skin and non-celebrity skin is just what the skin is subjected to. Celebrities lead a very different life from the average person's, and so their skin care must reflect that difference.  
What is the biggest barrier to good skin?
The biggest barrier whether it’s men or women, is confusion. I think it’s the media and advertising. There’s an immense potpourri of products. If I were an ordinary consumer, I would be like, "Whatever is in the shower soap dish is good enough."


Ethical machines?


The story below (from Defense - hat tip husband!) has nothing to do with fashion, or style - or aesthetics. What it does have to do with is ethics. Robots with ethics to be precise.  Those of us who are fascinated by AI take notice:

Now The Military Is Going To Build Robots That Have Morals


Are robots capable of moral or ethical reasoning? It’s no longer just a question for tenured philosophy professors or Hollywood directors. This week, it’s a question being put to the United Nations.



The Office of Naval Research will award $7.5 million in grant money over five years to university researchers from Tufts, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Brown, Yale and Georgetown to explore how to build a sense of right and wrong and moral consequence into autonomous robotic systems.



“Even though today’s unmanned systems are ‘dumb’ in comparison to a human counterpart, strides are being made quickly to incorporate more automation at a faster pace than we’ve seen before,” Paul Bello, director of the cognitive science program at the Office of Naval Research told Defense One. “For example, Google’s self-driving cars are legal and in-use in several states at this point. As researchers, we are playing catch-up trying to figure out the ethical and legal implications. We do not want to be caught similarly flat-footed in any kind of military domain where lives are at stake.”



The United States military prohibits lethal fully autonomous robots. And semi-autonomous robots can’t “select and engage individual targets or specific target groups that have not been previously selected by an authorized human operator,” even in the event that contact with the operator is cut off, according to a 2012 Department of Defense policy directive.



“Even if such systems aren’t armed, they may still be forced to make moral decisions,” Bello said. For instance, in a disaster scenario, a robot may be forced to make a choice about whom to evacuate or treat first, a situation where a bot might use some sense of ethical or moral reasoning. “While the kinds of systems we envision have much broader use in first-response, search-and-rescue and in the medical domain, we can’t take the idea of in-theater robots completely off the table,” Bello said.



Some members of the artificial intelligence, or AI, research and machine ethics communities were quick to applaud the grant. “With drones, missile defines, autonomous vehicles, etc., the military is rapidly creating systems that will need to make moral decisions,” AI researcher Steven Omohundro told Defense One. “Human lives and property rest on the outcomes of these decisions and so it is critical that they be made carefully and with full knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of the systems involved. The military has always had to define ‘the rules of war’ and this technology is likely to increase the stakes for that.”



“We’re talking about putting robots in more and more contexts in which we can’t predict what they’re going to do, what kind of situations they’ll encounter. So they need to do some kind of ethical reasoning in order to sort through various options,” said Wendell Wallach, the chair of the Yale Technology and Ethics Study Group and author of the book Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong.



The sophistication of cutting-edge drones like British BAESystems’s batwing-shaped Taranis and Northrop Grumman’s X-47B reveal more self-direction creeping into ever more heavily armed systems. The X-47B, Wallach said, is “enormous and it does an awful lot of things autonomously.”

But how do you code something as abstract as moral logic into a bunch of transistors? The vast openness of the problem is why the framework approach is important, says Wallach. Some types of morality are more basic, thus more code-able, than others.



“There’s operational morality, functional morality, and full moral agency,” Wallach said. “Operational morality is what you already get when the operator can discern all the situations that the robot may come under and program in appropriate responses… Functional morality is where the robot starts to move into situations where the operator can’t always predict what [the robot] will encounter and [the robot] will need to bring some form of ethical reasoning to bear.”



It’s a thick knot of questions to work through. But, Wallach says, with a high potential to transform the battlefield.



“One of the arguments for [moral] robots is that they may be even better than humans in picking a moral course of action because they may consider more courses of action,” he said.



Ronald Arkin, an AI expert from Georgia Tech and author of the book Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots, is a proponent of giving machines a moral compass. “It is not my belief that an unmanned system will be able to be perfectly ethical in the battlefield, but I am convinced that they can perform more ethically than human soldiers are capable of,” Arkin wrote in a 2007 research paper (PDF). Part of the reason for that, he said, is that robots are capable of following rules of engagement to the letter, whereas humans are more inconsistent.



AI robotics expert Noel Sharkey is a detractor. He’s beenhighly critical of armed drones in general. and has arguedthat autonomous weapons systems cannot be trusted to conform to international law.



“I do not think that they will end up with a moral or ethical robot,” Sharkey told Defense One. “For that we need to have moral agency. For that we need to understand others and know what it means to suffer. The robot may be installed with some rules of ethics but it won’t really care. It will follow a human designer’s idea of ethics.”



“The simple example that has been given to the press about scheduling help for wounded soldiers is a good one. My concern would be if [the military] were to extend a system like this for lethal autonomous weapons - weapons where the decision to kill is delegated to a machine; that would be deeply troubling,” he said.



This week, Sharkey and Arkins are debating the issue of whether or not morality can be built into AI systems before theU.N. where they may find an audience very sympathetic to the idea that a moratorium should be placed on the further development of autonomous armed robots.



Christof Heyns, U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, is calling for a moratorium. “There is reason to believe that states will, inter alia, seek to use lethal autonomous robotics for targeted killing,” Heyns said in an April 2013 report to the U.N.



The Defense Department’s policy directive on lethal autonomy offers little reassurance here since, the department can change it, without congressional approval, at the discretion of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and two undersecretaries of Defense. University of Denver scholar Heather Roff, in an op-ed for the Huffington Post, calls that a “disconcerting” lack of oversight and notes that “fielding of autonomous weapons then does not even raise to the level of the Secretary of Defense, let alone the president.”

If researchers can prove that robots can do moral math, even if in some limited form, they may be able to diffuse rising public anger and mistrust over armed unmanned vehicles. But it’s no small task.



“This is a significantly difficult problem and it’s not clear we have an answer to it,” said Wallach. “Robots both domestic and militarily are going to find themselves in situations where there are a number of courses of actions and they are going to need to bring some kinds of ethical routines to bear on determining the most ethical course of action. If we’re moving down this road of increasing autonomy in robotics, and that’s the same as Google cars as it is for military robots, we should begin now to do the research to how far can we get in ensuring the robot systems are safe and can make appropriate decisions in the context they operate.”

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

The always problematic spring footwear issue - Solutions

I love spring in New England. Everything is in bloom, there are flowers on the ground, on the trees, and in such abundance that any MiddleEastern transplant like me, used to drought and acrid summers, is bound to be envious. What is less enviable, though, is the ridiculously changey weather. A drop of 20 degrees overnight (and sometimes over day) is not uncommon. Maddening weather. So what can you wear that will look seasonal and not too heavy, stylish yet work appropriate?

To make things worse, you want a shoe with a bit of a lift to help the shorties out and yet comfortable to walk some distances in. I suppose that's the ultimate holy grail of the whole enterprise anyway.  So you can't have a heel that is too high or a footbed that is too un-cushioned. I've been thinking that a wedge pump is the way to go - but the tricky issue with wedge pumps is avoiding the nurse look or, for that matter, the dowdy old lady look or the comfort - orthopedic shoe look.

A comfortable yet moderately stylin' wedge pump. A winner in both form and function. It is a tall order ladies.

So I looked. And looked some more. Here's what I found.

DREAM:

Acne (lust for the impossible):

Tod's:

WISH:

DVF:
French Sole:
JCrew:

WANT:

Cheap Monday:
Cole Haan (and the ultimate winner I think):

Happier!

Ladies, NK's segment on The Doctors aired today, and she looked AMAZING!! She also sounded interesting, engaging, and so so smart and I loved the screen caps of the various Happier users.


Congratulations to Nataly and the Happier team!!!

Can't wait till you make room for us android folk...




Shameless self-promotion below, so don't scroll if gaging...





OK, no pretending needed, we’re pretty insanely awesomely excited that Happier will be part of the The Doctors episode today. A lot of people watch the show and we get a chance to share some of our tips for being happier with them? Awesome.
(In the Northeast we’re on at 2pm EST. To check your local channel listings, click here.)
Not only is this the first time Happier is on national TV but this was the first time I taped a segment for a national TV show. WHOA does a lot go into a really short 2-3 minute segment. I have a whole new degree of respect for the hundreds of people putting on The Doctors (and other similar shows).
IMG_5423IMG_5409
One of the fun parts of being on the show was picking out some orange outfits to wear. The producers asked me to bring 4-6 different options with me, which would be fine except I didn’t have 6 different orange pieces I could wear for the show. And since you guys know I wear something orange every single day, help to the rescue.
My dear friend is also an awesome stylist, so I asked her to help me find some awesome orange. I ended up wearing this dress she found and even a few of the doctors on the show commented how happy it looked on set!
IMG_5425
And funny thing about the dress: Because it had no belt they had to put my microphone charger pack behind my neck, taped to the top of my dress. About half way through the segment I felt something drop and there was my microphone pack, hanging down behind me. Lucky for me Travis, the doctor wearing scrubs, noticed it, gave a signal to pause taping, moved me off stage to get it fixed, and then walked me back to the right spot. What could have been a really stressful moment actually turned into a really awesome one when he gave me a hug and told me I was doing a good job. PHEW, because even though I am used to big audiences and lots of lights, nothing is quite like this.
(Here’s me, backstage, as they are putting the microphone stuff back together. One of the producers captured this shot.)
IMG_5421
If you have a chance to watch our segment, have fun and if you’re here because you saw us on The Doctors, welcome to Happier! We’re really psyched you’re here :) (And if you’re wondering where to get started, check out my Everyday Grateful Happier Course, which is the foundation of the happier life tips I shared on the show.)

DIY makeup


It was bound to happen. 3D printers are poised to move into the makeup counter:
This is MINK, a gadget with the following tantalizing tagline:

Turns any camera, phone or laptop into an endless beauty aisle


THE MAKEUP PRINTER

Mink is a desktop printer that prints makeup. It can take any image and instantly transform it into a wearable color cosmetic, turning any camera, phone or laptop into an endless beauty aisle. We are working super hard to bring you only the best possible product but in the meantime we hope you'll join us in the revolution! Please click on the link below to sign up as a software developer or to be notified when the Mink will be for sale.





Can you imagine the possibilities ladies?

Jeans of the moment

For years I've focused on black jeans (skinny, faded skinny, super skinny, trouser) but this summer the jean of the moment is not black, nor color, nor is it actually even dark blue - a washed-out denim rules the day.

Much of what is out there is supplemented by slashes and cuts, but I am nor sure that I like artificially distressed  and torn denim for ladies of a certain age (and that age is really anywhere north of 35).

What I want in my new pair of washed out jeans is this:

- a perfect pale clue color, not too white
- a slim but not too skinny (as in jegging) leg
- some stretch  (I would want to do the boyfriend cut but I'm too hippy for that)
- a fairly high rise to keep my muffin top under control
- a fairly cropped length, because the best way to wear washed-out jeans is with flats
- and absolutely no rips

Can it be done?

It wasn't easy. The amount of distressing out there is, well, distressing. But here is what I found:

DREAM:
Stella (a good cut, but a touch too dark):



WISH (the sweet spot for 99% of jeans):

Rag &Bone, Dre Boyfriend:


True Religion, Serena:

Frame denim, Le Garcon:


High Kai, Nudie (these might be contenders):


As are these: Acquaverde, Gretta:

Mother, The Looker:

WANT:

Gap, Curvy Skinny High Rise:
Ann Taylor Loft:


ASOS:

The next few items are from Bluefly, a good place for designer on discount, if they have your size:

Notify, Hellebora:

AG, Piper: If these were a shade lighter I'd be all over them - slouch but with stretch!


A little gross, a little fab?


Chinese actress and super-dresser Fan Bingbing at the NY premiere of a superhero movie, X Men: Days of the Future Past, in a Georges Chakra dress:





The feathers at the shoulders are a bit spooky - but kind of in a good way? 

And, since we're into feathers. here is Vicktoria Beckham in a peignoir-like frock, presumably her own, and one I, at least, do not covet: